시가 총액
24시간 볼륨
7720
암호화폐
62.66%
Bitcoin 공유

Ripple Lawsuit News: Ex-SEC Lawyer Reacts to Unusual XRP Filing by $10M Fined Stock Dealer

Ripple Lawsuit News: Ex-SEC Lawyer Reacts to Unusual XRP Filing by $10M Fined Stock Dealer


coinpedia
2025-04-05 04:36:01

The post Ripple Lawsuit News: Ex-SEC Lawyer Reacts to Unusual XRP Filing by $10M Fined Stock Dealer appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Ripple’s CEO, Brad Garlinghouse, recently shared a video celebrating what he called a victory in the long-running legal battle between Ripple Labs and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). While Ripple’s executives have confirmed the case is over, there’s been no official statement from the SEC, leaving many in the XRP community wondering what’s really going on. To add to the mystery, an unexpected filing popped up in the court case. A guy named Justin W. Keener sent an emergency request, claiming he has “decisive evidence” that could help Ripple and support freedom for Americans. But no one knows exactly what this evidence is. Keener says it has something to do with investment contracts he’s been collecting. NEW: An odd filing just now in the @SECGov vs. @Ripple docket — an emergency request to “present decisive evidence in favor of the defendants and in favor of liberty for the American people.” The letter, from a man named Justin W. Keener, doesn’t make clear what the so-called… pic.twitter.com/AQSDFIW6gi — Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) April 3, 2025 When Fox Business’ Eleanor Terrett looked into Keener, she found out the SEC had recently sued him for being an unregistered penny stock dealer. A court ordered him to pay over $10 million because of it. Legal experts aren’t taking his filing seriously. Former SEC lawyer Marc Fagel said it’s basically like spam getting through the court’s system and will likely be thrown out quickly. He explained that Keener isn’t part of the case and doesn’t have the right to submit evidence. Some people asked if Judge Analisa Torres might change her decision about Ripple’s liability. Fagel replied that this isn’t possible. “Judge Torres won’t be asked to, nor will she, ‘revoke’ her ruling on liability,” he said. Instead, both sides will try to adjust the remedies, not the original decision.


면책 조항 읽기 : 본 웹 사이트, 하이퍼 링크 사이트, 관련 응용 프로그램, 포럼, 블로그, 소셜 미디어 계정 및 기타 플랫폼 (이하 "사이트")에 제공된 모든 콘텐츠는 제 3 자 출처에서 구입 한 일반적인 정보 용입니다. 우리는 정확성과 업데이트 성을 포함하여 우리의 콘텐츠와 관련하여 어떠한 종류의 보증도하지 않습니다. 우리가 제공하는 컨텐츠의 어떤 부분도 금융 조언, 법률 자문 또는 기타 용도에 대한 귀하의 특정 신뢰를위한 다른 형태의 조언을 구성하지 않습니다. 당사 콘텐츠의 사용 또는 의존은 전적으로 귀하의 책임과 재량에 달려 있습니다. 당신은 그들에게 의존하기 전에 우리 자신의 연구를 수행하고, 검토하고, 분석하고, 검증해야합니다. 거래는 큰 손실로 이어질 수있는 매우 위험한 활동이므로 결정을 내리기 전에 재무 고문에게 문의하십시오. 본 사이트의 어떠한 콘텐츠도 모집 또는 제공을 목적으로하지 않습니다.