Market Cap
24h Vol
7720
Cryptocurrencies
62.66%
Bitcoin Share

Expert Warns Hyperliquid’s $10.6M JELLY Exploit Could Hit Other DeFi Protocols

Expert Warns Hyperliquid’s $10.6M JELLY Exploit Could Hit Other DeFi Protocols


BTC Pulse
2025-04-03 19:36:15

Hyperliquid Exploit Shakes Security Throughout DeFi The Hyperliquid platform is in the limelight after a $10.63 million exploit of its JELLY token. Experts characterize the breach as not a traditional bug but a risk oversight that can potentially expose other DeFi protocols to the same vulnerabilities. Dr. Jan Philipp Fritsche, a managing director at blockchain audit company Oak Security, analyzed the cause of the exploit as not code failure but unpriced risk—a long-established principle of conventional finance that DeFi platforms often ignore. How the JELLY Exploit Unfolded The attacker, in Fritsche’s view, manipulated the market by shorting JELLY by $5 million and then draining the margin. Hyperliquid was left with the exposure, and other users exploited this vulnerability through a group short squeeze. “The attacker created massive counter positions in JELLY, wagering that one side would break and the other would be covered,” Fritsche said. “Because payouts were not capped and risk was not contained, the protocol absorbed the loss—and the attacker made off with millions.” A Broader DeFi Risk Fritsche referred to the attack as a “textbook example of unpriced vega risk,” explaining how protocols are prone to overlook implied volatility. Lacking proper means of risk pricing, most decentralized exchanges are left exposed to such strategic attacks. Industry Reactions and Implications Backlash poured in in the wake of the attack. Bitget CEO Gracy Chen labeled Hyperliquid’s architecture as “immature, unethical, and unprofessional” and drew parallels between it and the now-defunct FTX. While Hyperliquid has promised to reimburse affected users, its reputation has taken a major hit. DeFi’s Mounting Losses The JELLY exploit is part of a larger pattern in DeFi. In 2024 alone, exploits cost $308.7 million—more than the $192.9 million lost to rug pulls. Just days after the Hyperliquid attack, another DeFi protocol, SIR.trading, was drained of its entire $355,000 total value locked. The event is a reminder that as DeFi grows, so must its security maturity lest history repeat itself.


Read the Disclaimer : All content provided herein our website, hyperlinked sites, associated applications, forums, blogs, social media accounts and other platforms (“Site”) is for your general information only, procured from third party sources. We make no warranties of any kind in relation to our content, including but not limited to accuracy and updatedness. No part of the content that we provide constitutes financial advice, legal advice or any other form of advice meant for your specific reliance for any purpose. Any use or reliance on our content is solely at your own risk and discretion. You should conduct your own research, review, analyse and verify our content before relying on them. Trading is a highly risky activity that can lead to major losses, please therefore consult your financial advisor before making any decision. No content on our Site is meant to be a solicitation or offer.