시가 총액
24시간 볼륨
10071
암호화폐
58.26%
Bitcoin 공유

Publishers cannot opt out of AI Overviews content, sparking concerns

Publishers cannot opt out of AI Overviews content, sparking concerns


Cryptopolitan
2025-07-04 16:06:28

A coalition of independent publishers has lodged an antitrust complaint with the European Commission, accusing Alphabet’s Google of abusing its dominant search position by using their material to power its AI Overviews without offering an opt ‑out. The group also seeks an interim injunction, warning that continued use would inflict irreversible damage to their readership and revenues. The complaints against Google are not unique, as earlier this year, the UK’s competition watchdog launched an investigation into the search engine giant’s dominance in search and search advertising. AI integration by Google has sparked publisher concerns Google’s AI Overviews automatically generate summaries that appear above traditional search links and are shown to more than a hundred countries. Since May of last year, these snippets have even included advertisements, marking Google ’s most significant push to weave AI into its core search service. But, some content providers argue that this feature unfairly diminishes traffic to their own sites. According to a June 30 filing seen by Reuters, the Independent Publishers Alliance contends that Google’s practice “misuses web content for AI Overviews,” causing “significant harm to publishers, including losses in traffic, readership and revenue.” They claim the placement of AI summaries at the very top of search results sidelines the original articles, effectively steering users away from the publishers themselves. “Google’s core search engine service is misusing web content for Google’s AI Overviews in Google Search, which have caused, and continue to cause, significant harm to publishers, including news publishers in the form of traffic, readership and revenue loss.” – Publishers’ filing. The complaint underscores that publishers have no way to stop Google’s large language models from scraping their work, yet if they try to block crawling, they also forfeit their presence in ordinary search listings. “Publishers using Google Search do not have the option to opt out from their material being ingested… without losing their ability to appear in Google’s general search results page,” it states. The Alliance is not alone. The Movement for an Open Web, a collective of digital advertisers and publishers, and the UK-based legal charity Foxglove have joined the suit, urging both Brussels and London’s Competition and Markets Authority to impose urgent restraints to prevent further damage and ensure access to news. This adds to the growing conflict between AI and journalism Neither the European Commission nor the UK CMA would comment on ongoing filings. Google, for its part, insists it drives “billions of clicks to websites each day” and that its new AI features help users find content and businesses. A spokesperson told the media that: “New AI experiences in Search enable people to ask even more questions, which creates new opportunities for content and businesses to be discovered.” Google also dismissed claims about declining traffic as based on “incomplete and skewed data,” pointing out that fluctuations can stem from seasonality, changing user interests, or standard algorithm tweaks. “The reality is that sites can gain and lose traffic for a variety of reasons, including seasonal demand, interests of users, and regular algorithmic updates to Search,” said the spokesperson. Foxglove co‑executive director Rosa Curling warned that independent news outlets face an “ existential threat ” from AI Overviews. “That’s why we are urging regulators around the world to let journalism opt out,” Curling told Reuters. “That’s why with this complaint, Foxglove and our partners are urging the European Commission, along with other regulators around the world, to take a stand and allow independent journalism to opt out.” – Curling. Similar legal action has already been launched in the United States, where an educational technology firm argues that Google’s summaries undermine demand for original content, sapping visitor numbers and subscriber growth. As both sides prepare for what could become landmark antitrust determinations, it remains to be seen if Google can continue to bolster its AI-driven search innovations without trampling on the livelihoods of the very publishers whose content fuels its algorithms. KEY Difference Wire : the secret tool crypto projects use to get guaranteed media coverage


면책 조항 읽기 : 본 웹 사이트, 하이퍼 링크 사이트, 관련 응용 프로그램, 포럼, 블로그, 소셜 미디어 계정 및 기타 플랫폼 (이하 "사이트")에 제공된 모든 콘텐츠는 제 3 자 출처에서 구입 한 일반적인 정보 용입니다. 우리는 정확성과 업데이트 성을 포함하여 우리의 콘텐츠와 관련하여 어떠한 종류의 보증도하지 않습니다. 우리가 제공하는 컨텐츠의 어떤 부분도 금융 조언, 법률 자문 또는 기타 용도에 대한 귀하의 특정 신뢰를위한 다른 형태의 조언을 구성하지 않습니다. 당사 콘텐츠의 사용 또는 의존은 전적으로 귀하의 책임과 재량에 달려 있습니다. 당신은 그들에게 의존하기 전에 우리 자신의 연구를 수행하고, 검토하고, 분석하고, 검증해야합니다. 거래는 큰 손실로 이어질 수있는 매우 위험한 활동이므로 결정을 내리기 전에 재무 고문에게 문의하십시오. 본 사이트의 어떠한 콘텐츠도 모집 또는 제공을 목적으로하지 않습니다.