While regulators and lawmakers in the U.S. work to establish clearer digital asset legislation, the judiciary has taken on a more immediate role in determining how cryptocurrencies are treated under existing legal frameworks. The Ripple lawsuit , specifically its handling of XRP token sales, has become a pivotal moment in U.S. crypto law. In the recent publication by the International Bar Association (IBA), titled Digital Regulations in the Metaverse Era, the Ripple case is referenced as having significant potential to influence how courts draw boundaries in token-based transactions. The analysis focuses on how the court, under Judge Analisa Torres, made a distinction between “direct contractual efforts between issuers/promoters and purchasers” versus general “market purchasing in the token space.” This differentiation could become the basis for future case law affecting both developers and investors across the cryptocurrency landscape. The International Bar Association affirms that the outcome of Ripple v. SEC will set a precedent for the entire cryptocurrency industry. This is documented below. https://t.co/aHaf8WoiE2 pic.twitter.com/0ZqnVG8X8t — SMQKE (@SMQKEDQG) July 30, 2025 XRP and the Judicial Line Drawn At the core of the case was whether XRP constituted a security under U.S. law. The court found that Ripple’s sales of XRP on public exchanges did not violate existing securities laws , though it did rule against Ripple’s direct sales to institutional investors. This decision ultimately provided Ripple with a legal win that many in the industry had anticipated for years, and opened up the U.S. market for XRP adoption. While the lawsuit extended much longer than that ruling, the decision was pivotal and remains unchanged despite subsequent developments in the lawsuit. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Implications Beyond Ripple and XRP In the highlighted section, it notes that rulings “have the potential to create a precedent in the cryptocurrency industry.” This includes how courts might interpret relationships between promoters and token buyers moving forward. Crypto researcher SMQKE (@SMQKEDQG) highlighted this development with an image from the IBA’s report, reinforcing the relevance of the precedent set by XRP. That judicial distinction could have a lasting influence on how new tokens are structured, marketed, and offered in secondary markets. Ripple fought for clarity for XRP, and now market participants can draw from this outcome when crafting token strategies that minimize legal exposure. The precedent doesn’t resolve all regulatory uncertainty, but it offers a functional distinction that may influence future enforcement actions. The cryptocurrency space is finally receiving proper regulation through the recently passed GENIUS Act , and additional bills are currently being considered by the U.S. government. XRP will always hold a unique role in setting an important precedent for crypto regulation. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post International Bar Association: Ripple (XRP) v. SEC Will Set a Precedent for Crypto Industry appeared first on Times Tabloid .
