Crypto proponent Remi Relief has outlined his perspective on how SWIFT is structuring its blockchain efforts, describing it as a two-part system that separates messaging from liquidity. According to his explanation, Linea, developed by ConsenSys, was chosen for the messaging function, while XRP helps in liquidity provision. His remarks were aimed at clarifying recent discussions around SWIFT’s blockchain prototype and its collaboration with ConsenSys. SWIFT is a two part System…messaging and liquidity I told you the other day ConsenSys was the one behind LINEA for SWIFT messaging XRP is for the liquidity. If SWIFT didn’t use XRP, Ripple would eventually take it over since they are the ones that hold the patent to… pic.twitter.com/9d1pyD8qGx — The Real Remi Relief (@RemiReliefX) September 29, 2025 Linea’s Purpose and Development Remi Relief emphasized that Linea is not intended for liquidity or settlement functions, but rather serves as a messaging system. In his description, Linea enables banks to transmit instructions between one another on-chain. He highlighted that ConsenSys is behind Linea’s development, aligning with reports that SWIFT partnered with the company to test blockchain-based cross-border payment solutions. In his view, this means Linea functions as an infrastructure layer where developers can build applications for communication between financial institutions, but it is not designed for direct retail use. XRP and On-Demand Liquidity The central point in Remi Relief’s analysis is that XRP remains the asset positioned for liquidity services. He noted that only XRP has On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) and argued that this makes it irreplaceable in this framework. He added that Ripple holds a patent for ODL, which he sees as a critical factor in determining how liquidity solutions are integrated into global payment systems. From his perspective, if SWIFT did not incorporate XRP for liquidity , Ripple could eventually dominate that role due to its proprietary position in ODL technology. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Bridging, Stablecoins and Interoperability Remi Relief also referenced interoperability as an important consideration in this structure. Remi pointed to the existence of RLUSD on both Ethereum and the XRP Ledger . He also mentioned that bridging solutions, such as Axelar, connect XRP with other blockchains, including Ethereum, which hosts assets like RLUSD and Linea. He suggested that these connections provide the means for liquidity and messaging systems to interact, reinforcing his argument that XRP and Linea are complementary components in SWIFT’s setup rather than competing solutions. In his post, Remi Relief summarized SWIFT’s work as a system divided into messaging and liquidity. He stated that Linea, developed by ConsenSys, accounts for the messaging component, while XRP provides the liquidity through ODL. His interpretation links recent announcements about SWIFT’s blockchain partnerships with the role of XRP in cross-border payments, presenting a structured view of how the two can operate together. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post What Ripple Would Do If SWIFT Fails to Use XRP appeared first on Times Tabloid .
